Deep, dark, dangerous madeleines
I have enjoyed poking around the blog Orangette for as long as I have been writing my own. I love Molly's gentle humor, gorgeous photos and knockout recipes. Somebody give this girl her own cookbook, fast! (Does she already have one? At the rate food bloggers have been signing contracts lately, it's hard to keep up...)
Last week I begged, borrowed and essentially stole a madeleine pan from my food muse Alison (who needs to get her own website so I can link to her!) just so I could make Molly's recipe for Chocolate Madeleines with Toasted Almonds and Coffee.
Yeah, you read that right.
I have a complicated relationship with madeleines. When they're good, they're ever so delish, but when they're bad (for example, when they're suffocating in plastic wrappers in those fishbowls near the Starbucks registers) they're really bad. Or not even bad so much as enormously blah, which might be worse. A good madeleine is light, fluffy, nutty and rich all at once. It's hard to make them well, so I've just left it up to the professionals most of the time.
But a chocolate madeleine. With two kinds of alochol involved. Now that's something to consider. And possibly, to bake.
Which I did.
The results were not enormously blah. In fact, they were meltingly tender, exceedingly rich and properly boozy. Apart from their shape, they didn't resemble any madeleines I'd ever met before. They were more like refined, incredibly decadent glazed brownies.
Orangette and her madeleines: highly recommended.

Last week I begged, borrowed and essentially stole a madeleine pan from my food muse Alison (who needs to get her own website so I can link to her!) just so I could make Molly's recipe for Chocolate Madeleines with Toasted Almonds and Coffee.
Yeah, you read that right.
I have a complicated relationship with madeleines. When they're good, they're ever so delish, but when they're bad (for example, when they're suffocating in plastic wrappers in those fishbowls near the Starbucks registers) they're really bad. Or not even bad so much as enormously blah, which might be worse. A good madeleine is light, fluffy, nutty and rich all at once. It's hard to make them well, so I've just left it up to the professionals most of the time.
But a chocolate madeleine. With two kinds of alochol involved. Now that's something to consider. And possibly, to bake.
Which I did.
The results were not enormously blah. In fact, they were meltingly tender, exceedingly rich and properly boozy. Apart from their shape, they didn't resemble any madeleines I'd ever met before. They were more like refined, incredibly decadent glazed brownies.
Orangette and her madeleines: highly recommended.






















7 Comments:
What?? In all your bags, you didn't bring back a madeleine pan? :-)
Gorgeous madeleines, Cindy! I am so happy to hear that you - fresh from the birthplace of madeleines, no less! - approve of these. And merci mille fois for your very, very kind words!
Cindy,
That reminds me of something...
Good work, they look fabulous!
Oh yummmm...I'll have to check out the recipe. Although my baking luck lately seems very hit or miss. My little sous chef might like those.
Lu - rest assured, I own one, but it's with the rest of my worldly possessions in storage at the moment... that also explains why I've been wearing the same five shirts for the past year and a half...
Molly - Glad you like the piece. Love your blog, but you knew that!
Kevin - ?? I need clarification!
Thanks Katy!
Hi Janice - don't worry, they're easy ...
Gosh, Cindy, I'm delighted, I'll make these immediately, having been disappointed by madeleines too many times to count, I've completely abandoned them! I'm happy to have them back! On to Orangette!
Post a Comment
<< Home